Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

Your Message

Click here to log in

What's the name of our main installation product (in uppercase letters), directly followed by the current year?

 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 01-13-2014, 01:01 AM
    linder

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Tom,

    Thank you!

    In April 04, 2012, we changed the default timeout for blocking receive calls in HTTP download actions from 5,000 milliseconds to 10,000 milliseconds.

    Friedrich
  • 01-12-2014, 12:03 PM
    Tom H.

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Friedrich,

    Another one from the vaults...

    I had one report on this year but it was an outlier (person was using terminal services to log into a remote VM over slow lines, etc.)

    In any case, it just got me wondering what the default timeout was actually changed to so I can tell our Tech Support staff.

    Thanks again for such a great product,
    Tom H.
  • 02-23-2012, 10:45 AM
    linder

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Hi Tom,

    PERFECT!!! Thank you for the very good news

    BTW, I think we'll increase the default download timeout from 5,000 ms to 10,000 ms in the upcoming SB 7.7. If users prefer the old 5 sec timeout, they can use the new #pragma to reset it.

    Thanks again!

    Friedrich
  • 02-23-2012, 10:37 AM
    Tom H.

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Okay, recompiled wupdate.exe with a new http component (10 sec) and...

    Works every time!

    We ran side by side tests, 30 iterations, on an overloaded network, original (5 sec) vs new one. The original failed 99% of the time, new one never failed.

    I thank you, and our Tech Support people thank you!

    Tom
  • 02-22-2012, 05:40 AM
    linder

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Hi Tom,



    New HTTP test libraries sent. Please keep me posted.

    Thanks,
    Friedrich
  • 02-21-2012, 12:07 PM
    Tom H.

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Your support continues to be absolutely stellar!

    Thanks again,
    Tom
  • 02-21-2012, 10:46 AM
    linder

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Hi Tom,

    I'll compile and send you a component with 10,000ms and another one with 15,000ms to test it. You only have to replace the current library (I'll send further instructions tomorrow morning) and recompile your setup.exe. And if it still does not work as expected, we'll investigate further.

    Friedrich
  • 02-21-2012, 10:40 AM
    Tom H.

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Good on the pragma, and absolutely I'd love any interim option you can provide.

    Maybe just go with 10,000. That should cover it and reduce (hopefully eliminate) support calls over this issue.

    Thanks in advance,
    Tom
  • 02-21-2012, 03:02 AM
    linder

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Tom,

    The latest manintenance release was only a bug-fix build without any improvements. In SB 7.7 we have added a new #pragma to define the HTTP Download timeout.

    But if you are interested, I can send you a private HTTP component build with an increased timeout. What timeout would you prefer? 10,000 ms, 15,000 ms, ...?

    Friedrich
  • 02-20-2012, 05:50 PM
    Tom H.

    Re: Wupdate, 5060, etc.

    Friedrich,

    Is there any chance the latest SB 7.6 updates included an increase to the timeout (greater than 5000) in the Download File function?

    Thanks,
    Tom
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •