Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: BACKUP Files Suggestion

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Hi Friedrich

    A suggestion if I may.

    When a SB installer makes copies of files to the BACKUP folder, it might be handy to
    have it append the .0001 .0002 file extensions to the whole existing filename.ext
    instead of replacing the .ext with the incrementin numeric.
    That way there would be no uncertainty about which file is which. See attached
    screenshot.

    This change may cause some problems when restoring older versions, but that could
    probably be handled OK.

    John
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Good idea

    Jeff Slarve
    www.jssoftware.com
    www.twitter.com/jslarve
    I'll search help files & Google for you.

  3. #3

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    John,

    > A suggestion if I may.

    I like the thought but some AV's dislike double extensions, ie: more
    than one period.

    Maybe something like...

    ClaTPS-DLL.0001
    ClaTPS-LIB.0001

    --
    Lee White

    RPM Report Viewer.: http://www.cwaddons.com/products/rpm/
    RPM Review........: http://www.clarionmag.com/cmag/v11/v11n06rpm.html
    Report Faxing.....: http://www.cwaddons.com/products/afe/
    ---Enroll Today---: http://CWaddons.com

    Creative Reporting: http://www.CreativeReporting.com

    Product Release & Update Notices
    http://twitter.com/DeveloperPLUS

    Windows 8 brings us "The Oval, Bumper Car, Roller Coaster of Wait!"

  4. #4

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Lee

    Yeah, that would work too. I had not heard of that problem with some AVs. I guess they
    also hate the .0001 extensions also.

    John

  5. #5

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    John,

    > also hate the .0001 extensions also.

    I've never run into that but I have had problems in the past when I
    programmatically stuffed a second extension onto a filename.

    --
    Lee White

    RPM Report Viewer.: http://www.cwaddons.com/products/rpm/
    RPM Review........: http://www.clarionmag.com/cmag/v11/v11n06rpm.html
    Report Faxing.....: http://www.cwaddons.com/products/afe/
    ---Enroll Today---: http://CWaddons.com

    Creative Reporting: http://www.CreativeReporting.com

    Product Release & Update Notices
    http://twitter.com/DeveloperPLUS

    Windows 8 brings us "The Oval, Bumper Car, Roller Coaster of Wait!"

  6. #6

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Too kinky

    Jeff Slarve
    www.jssoftware.com
    www.twitter.com/jslarve
    I'll search help files & Google for you.

  7. #7

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Jeff,

    > Too kinky

    Yes, that may well have been the response from AVG!

    Lee White

  8. #8

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Hi Lee,

    > I like the thought but some AV's dislike double extensions, ie: more
    > than one period.

    Yes, double extensions are potential candidates for trouble (AV's are real
    troublemakers).

    > Maybe something like...
    >
    > ClaTPS-DLL.0001
    > ClaTPS-LIB.0001

    I agree 100%. That should work fine. I think we can add this as an option.
    So developers can continue with the "old" backup method or choose the "new"
    one.

    Friedrich

  9. #9

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Hi John,

    > A suggestion if I may.

    Very good idea. I'll see what I can do.

    Thank you for your suggestion.

    Friedrich

  10. #10

    Default Re: BACKUP Files Suggestion

    Hi John,

    I have added a new 'PRESERVE_BACKUPEXT' #pragma. In the upcoming
    SetupBuilder 8.1, you can set this #pragma to let the installer create
    backup files in form of 'ClaTPS-DLL.0001'. See attached screenshot.

    The new (optional) backup method is fully backward compatible to previous
    SetupBuilder versions.

    Thank you again for your suggestion.

    Friedrich
    Attached Images Attached Images  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •