+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: InstallShield vs. SetupBuilder

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    1

    Thumbs up InstallShield vs. SetupBuilder

    InstallShield was killing us. What looked good on paper never took off. It's too bloated, too buggy, too slow. We switched to SetupBuilder Developer Edition Version 8.1 three weeks ago and our team rewrote all codes and routines in record time. And what should I say — it installed without a single glitch on 1,000 machines. Hurray! Hurray! Hurray! The SetupBuilder executable is faster and way smaller (about 100MB!). Guys, we owe you a beer. No, hell. We owe you a case of beer

    Keep up the excellent work. Kudos to the Lindersoft SetupBuilder staff.

    A huge fan!

    Chris

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,307

    Default Re: InstallShield vs. SetupBuilder

    Wow, thank you Chris. Good news like this is music to my ears

    Friedrich

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •