Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: VC++ Redistributables - are we permitted to deploy MS own installer?

  1. #1

    Default VC++ Redistributables - are we permitted to deploy MS own installer?

    Hello all,

    since Nettalk 11 requires the latest version of OpenSSL, if we tinker a secure
    webserver, and that OpenSSL again requires the latest fashion of the Microsoft
    Visual C++ Redistributable, we have to provide them to our endusers.

    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/...al-c-downloads

    There is the option to tell SB to include them into the installer. However, I
    have to confess that I failed to manage this.

    Even more, there is a small chance that the endusers install our program on a
    segregated network with no access to the internet. So, missing this inclusion
    of the redistrubutables into my installer is not too bad at all then, as I
    still have to provide some solution for the admin to obtain that little critter
    anyway. At least I can tell them the download-link. Sending out that installer
    as part of my ZIP, together with my own installer, would make it more
    convenient for the admins, though.

    So my question is: Are we permitted to include this Microsoft Visual C++
    Redistributable vc_redist.x86.exe into our deployment package?

    Or are we only allowed to point to Microsofts website, for the admins to get it
    themselves?

    Microsoft writes:

    "If any of these files are
    provided by Microsoft, check
    whether you're permitted to
    redistribute them.
    You'll find a link to the
    Visual Studio license terms
    in the IDE."

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp...s?view=vs-2019

    Hmmm, I do not use Visual Studio, I do not have their IDE. OpenSSL did write
    that program and its DLLs.

    Does anyone of you know more about this Legalese?


    Regards,
    Wolfgang Orth
    www.odata.de

    Please note:
    From time to time it happens, that I overlook a reply to my postings.
    Please don't be angry.
    In case of an emergency, try to contact me via mail.

    Bitte beachten:
    Von Zeit zu Zeit passiert es mir, dass ich Antworten auf meine Postings übersehe.
    Bitte nicht böse sein.
    Im Notfall bitte Kontakt per Mail versuchen.

  2. #2

    Default Re: VC++ Redistributables - are we permitted to deploy MS own installer?

    Hi Wolfgang,

    On 10/20/2020 08:41 AM, Wolfgang Orth wrote:
    > So my question is: Are we permitted to include this Microsoft Visual C++
    > Redistributable vc_redist.x86.exe into our deployment package?

    Yes, you should, see
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp...d?view=vs-2019

    "In your deployments, you can redistribute any version of a Visual C++
    library that's licensed for redistribution. Here are three ways to
    deploy them:

    ....

    Local deployment, in which you copy particular Visual C++ DLLs from your
    Visual Studio installation—typically in \Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
    Visual Studio version\VC\Redist\platform\library\—and install them on
    target computers in the same folder as the application executable. You
    can use this deployment method to enable installation by users who don't
    have administrator rights, or for applications that can be run from a
    network share."

    You should be able to download the one you need from the link you
    posted. They may be part of some bundles, but you should be able to get
    whichever ones you need for free.

    Best regards,


    --

    Arnor Baldvinsson
    Icetips Alta LLC

  3. #3

    Default Re: VC++ Redistributables - are we permitted to deploy MS own installer?

    Arnor,

    my problem is, that I do _not_ have Visual Studio licenced.

    If I could deploy Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable vc_redist.x86.exe with
    my Installer I would be happe then.

    However, I do not want to trigger the wrath of the Microsoft gods ... and their lawyers!

    Regards,
    Wolfgang Orth
    www.odata.de

    Please note:
    From time to time it happens, that I overlook a reply to my postings.
    Please don't be angry.
    In case of an emergency, try to contact me via mail.

    Bitte beachten:
    Von Zeit zu Zeit passiert es mir, dass ich Antworten auf meine Postings übersehe.
    Bitte nicht böse sein.
    Im Notfall bitte Kontakt per Mail versuchen.

  4. #4

    Default Re: VC++ Redistributables - are we permitted to deploy MS own installer?

    Meanwhile I was able to solve this.

    >There is the option to tell SB to include them into the installer. However, I
    >have to confess that I failed to manage this.

    I have had a conversation with Friedrich here in the group some months ago.

    My problem was, that when SB is called from within my standard user account (my
    regular account), then the Redistributable Manager is unable to connect and
    download the list of available files.

    Once I called SB as Admin, I could obtain the list and set the appropriate
    checkmark. Back in the standard user account, I marked the Redistributable
    under Core Prerequisites. I have absolutely no clue, whether this helped, but
    at least now my installer got inflated with appx 30 MB and if that critter is
    not installed, SB pops up a message and suggests to do so. If thsi or a more
    recent Redistributable pack is at present, then SB just installs my very own
    stuff and all is fine!

    Case closed.


    Regards,
    Wolfgang Orth
    www.odata.de

    Please note:
    From time to time it happens, that I overlook a reply to my postings.
    Please don't be angry.
    In case of an emergency, try to contact me via mail.

    Bitte beachten:
    Von Zeit zu Zeit passiert es mir, dass ich Antworten auf meine Postings übersehe.
    Bitte nicht böse sein.
    Im Notfall bitte Kontakt per Mail versuchen.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •